When discussing options for a restoration, what alternative should you have included for a patient opposed to metal?

The correct choice highlights the importance of presenting a comprehensive range of options when discussing restoration alternatives with patients who may have preferences against metal restorations. In this context, mentioning implant placement as a viable option provides a non-metal solution that could align well with the patient's desires.

Implant placement stands out as a sophisticated restoration method, allowing for the replacement of missing teeth without relying on traditional metal materials. By introducing implants as an alternative, the practitioner enhances patient understanding of their choices and promotes informed decision-making, which is essential for patient-centered care.

Discussing only one specific option, like the zirconia bridge, undermines the principle of offering a variety of suitable alternatives tailored to the patient's needs. While financial considerations and discounts can be part of the conversation, they do not directly address the patient's desire to avoid metal. This broader approach not only addresses the patient's concerns regarding the materials used in restorations but also fosters a stronger therapeutic relationship through open communication about all available options.